Explore the Collections to Classrooms resource with students and identify two or three objects connected to your inquiry. Students record one question each object gives them.
Students observe, handle, photograph, and sketch. For each encounter they note: what is it, what does it tell me, and what question does it give me that the digital version couldn't?
Students bring photographs and questions to AI using the prompts below. AI is the research partner for what they found — not the authority on what taonga mean or whose stories they carry.
Students complete the Experience Trace Scale. The evidence of thinking sits alongside whatever Auckland Museum programme the class has been using.
| Level | Years 1–6 | Years 7–10 | Years 11–13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I can describe one object or exhibit from Auckland Museum that I couldn't have experienced properly on a screen. | I can describe a specific object and explain what its physical presence at the museum adds that the Collections to Classrooms digital version cannot. | I can analyse why the physical encounter with a specific taonga or specimen produces a qualitatively different understanding from digital or AI-mediated access. |
| 2 | I can say whose story the object or exhibit tells and why it is at Auckland Museum. | I can explain the historical or cultural significance of a specific object and identify the community or context it comes from. | I can situate a specific object within its broader historical, cultural, or ecological context and identify the interpretive choices Auckland Museum has made in how it is presented. |
| 3 | I can say one thing AI told me about what I saw and whether it matched what I experienced at the museum. | I can identify where AI's account matched the museum's own description and the knowledge-holder interviews, and where AI simplified or missed something important. | I can critically evaluate AI's account against the museum's own interpretation, the Collections to Classrooms resource, and where relevant the perspectives of the communities whose taonga are represented. |
| 4 | I can say why being at Auckland Museum gave me something I couldn't have got from a screen. | I can explain what direct encounter with museum objects adds to learning that the Collections to Classrooms resource and AI cannot provide. | I can articulate the difference between encountering an original object, engaging with a digital 3D scan, and querying AI — and explain what each produces that the others cannot. |
| 5 | I can say one question the visit gave me that I still want answered. | I can identify a question raised by the visit that remains unresolved and propose what source, experience, or expert would help answer it. | I can propose a research question arising from the visit, identify appropriate sources, and explain what additional knowledge — from knowledge-holders, specialists, or further archival work — would be needed to develop a well-evidenced response. |