Ask students one question: what decisions does Parliament make that affect your life? Record their answers. These predictions become the evidence students test when they return.
Choose from How Parliament Works, Debating Roleplay, or the Karaehe Kaewa virtual visit. All programmes are designed and led by Parliamentary educators. See column three for the full programme list.
Students observe the spaces, the procedures, and the people. Use the observation prompts in column two. Notes, sketches, and voice recordings on a mobile phone are all useful ways to capture what students notice.
Return to the predictions students made before the visit. What was confirmed? What surprised them? What questions do they now have that they didn't have before?
Democracy is not just a system. It is a set of choices people make every day. What did you see at Parliament that showed you democracy in action — and what did it require of the people inside?
| Level | Years 1–6 | Years 7–10 | Years 11–13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I can describe one thing I saw at Parliament that showed me democracy is real, not just a word in a book. | I can describe the key spaces I visited and explain what each one does in the process of lawmaking. | I can characterise New Zealand's parliamentary system from direct observation and explain how its structure reflects its constitutional arrangements. |
| 2 | I can say one decision Parliament makes that affects my life and explain how I know that from what I saw. | I can explain how the layout and procedures of Parliament reflect democratic principles and identify where I saw those principles in action. | I can connect the physical design of Parliament — the Chamber, the committee rooms, the library — to the constitutional principles each space is designed to serve. |
| 3 | I can say one thing AI told me about Parliament and whether it matched what I actually saw. | I can identify where AI's account of Parliament's processes matched what I observed and where it generalised or missed what direct experience revealed. | I can critically evaluate AI's account of New Zealand's constitutional and democratic arrangements against my own observations, identifying points of accuracy, omission, and oversimplification. |
| 4 | I can explain one thing about Parliament that I could only understand by being there — not by reading or watching a video. | I can explain what being inside Parliament added to my understanding of democracy that a description or image could not have provided. | I can articulate what the physical and procedural experience of Parliament contributes to civic understanding that secondary sources — including AI — cannot replicate. |
| 5 | I can say one question I have now about how New Zealand's democracy works that I didn't have before I visited. | I can identify one aspect of New Zealand's democratic system that I want to investigate further, and explain what my visit showed me that made that question worth asking. | I can propose a civic or constitutional question arising from my visit, identify appropriate sources and investigative methods, and explain what a well-evidenced answer would contribute to understanding New Zealand's democratic system. |