← Back to Evaluating AI Output
Tomorrow Ready · Evaluating AI Output
Subject adaptation · Years 11 to 13 · English / Literacy · Field-Based STEM · Tony Jones
The student who accepts the first interpretive position they generate has not yet evaluated. They have accepted. The Evaluation Gate makes that difference visible before the essay is written, not after it is submitted.
The Evaluation Gate requires students to evaluate before they commit. Two or three candidate approaches, one named criterion, one comparison, one written justification: this sequence makes the selection decision visible and assessable before any drafting begins.
Teacher provides the two or three candidate approaches. Students select the criterion from a short teacher-provided list. Justification is written in class before the drafting session begins.
Students generate their own candidate approaches and name their own criterion. The justification is assessed as a component of the achievement standard submission. At Merit and Excellence, the justification names a reason specific to this text and this task.
If two students submit identical justifications, return both with one question: "What is the specific reason this approach works for your reading of this text?" The justification must be tied to the local text, not to a general essay-writing principle.
The Evaluation Gate justification is process evidence; keep it brief enough that students are not spending disproportionate time on the gate relative to the essay itself.
Evidence Lock · Position First Protocol · Friction Framing