Tomorrow Ready · Traceable Decisions
Subject adaptation · Years 7–8 · English / Literacy · Field-Based STEM · Tony Jones
A fluent draft is not evidence of writing. The Reconstruction Check is. When students close all tools and account from memory for the decisions behind their writing, what they can explain is what they own.
After any writing or drafting phase, students close all tools and account from memory for the key decisions behind their writing. The account is submitted alongside the draft as a required component.
The account is a diagnostic artefact: it shows what the student genuinely owns inside the draft, distinct from what the draft itself presents. A student who can account fluently for their writing decisions has written.
Year 7 — Persuasive writing
Students draft a persuasive text. After tools close, they name one language or structural decision, one reason for it, and one thing they would have done differently with more time. The account reveals whether the argument structure was the student's own or arrived from a tool.
Year 8 — Extended response
Students write an extended response to a text or topic. After tools close, they name one decision about what to include or exclude, one reason, and one uncertainty about whether their response answers the question. This three-part account is the secure evidence point the assessment requires.
Decision checkpoint
Tell students at the task briefing that the Reconstruction Check is part of what they are submitting. Students who know this attend differently to their own decisions while drafting.
Teacher judgement note
Do not penalise a student whose account is less polished than their draft. A brief, honest account from a student who struggled is more valuable evidence than a fluent account that repeats the draft's language.
Related frameworks
Reconstruction Check (English Years 9–10) · Decision Vignette (English Years 4–6) · Evidence Lock (English Years 7–8)