Project Janszoon's free Education Toolbox contains habitat guides, species identification resources, and field activities for the park. Download it alongside the Abel Tasman App. Students arrive knowing what they might find — and why finding it matters.
DOC education kits are available at three sites — Marahau, Bark Bay/Wairima, and Anchorage. Each kit contains equipment for field activities focused on native biodiversity, predator control, water quality, and habitat. Contact DOC Motueka to access the kits at your chosen site.
Project Janszoon's thirty-year vision is to ecologically transform the park. Students ask at every site: what is this place being restored from, and what is it being restored toward? The answer is the most powerful science curriculum available in the Tasman region.
Schools in the region can formally adopt a section of the park through Project Janszoon's programme — taking responsibility for monitoring, planting, and maintaining a specific area over time. This is the deepest version of the authentic experience: ongoing kaitiakitanga rather than a single visit.
| Level | Years 0–6 | Years 7–10 | Years 11–13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I can describe one thing I encountered in Abel Tasman — a bird, a beach, an estuary, the waka — that I could not have experienced on a screen. | I can describe what direct encounter with the park's ecosystems and restoration work added that photographs, AI descriptions, or classroom resources could not replicate. | I can analyse why physical encounter with an ecological restoration in progress produces qualitatively different understanding from data, media, or AI-mediated access to conservation science. |
| 2 | I can explain one thing humans are doing to help native animals come back to Abel Tasman, and say how I know it is working. | I can explain the relationship between predator control, habitat restoration, and native species recovery in the Abel Tasman, drawing on specific observations from the visit. | I can situate the Abel Tasman restoration within the broader Predator Free NZ programme, identifying what the park's model demonstrates about feasibility, scale, and the role of community conservation partnerships. |
| 3 | I can say one thing AI told me about native birds or the park and whether it matched what I found when I was there. | I can identify where AI's account of Abel Tasman's ecology and restoration matched what I observed and heard from DOC and Project Janszoon educators, and where direct field experience added evidence AI could not provide. | I can critically evaluate AI's account of ecological restoration methodology and kaitiakitanga against the specific conservation work I observed in the park, identifying where the local evidence complicates or extends AI's general account. |
| 4 | I can say why being in Abel Tasman — on the beach, in the forest, on the waka — gave me something I could not have got from a screen. | I can explain what walking a coastal track, visiting an estuary, or paddling a waka adds to conservation understanding that no classroom resource or AI description provides. | I can articulate the difference between knowing about ecological restoration and kaitiakitanga, studying them through AI and secondary sources, and encountering them in a place where they are actively happening — and explain what each encounter produces that the others cannot. |
| 5 | I can say one thing I want to do because of what I learned in Abel Tasman. | I can identify a conservation action — local, regional, or national — that my visit to Abel Tasman makes me want to take, and propose a realistic first step. | I can develop a research question or conservation proposal arising from the visit, identify appropriate sources and knowledge-holders — including Project Janszoon, DOC, and iwi — and explain what additional evidence would be needed to pursue it meaningfully. |