The collection covers Canterbury's human and natural history from pre-settlement Māori occupation through European colonisation to the present. The natural history holdings include significant geological, botanical, and zoological collections connected to the Canterbury landscape.
Canterbury Museum holds significant taonga Māori in partnership with mana whenua. The new Araiteuru space in the redeveloped museum will provide a dedicated space for mana whenua to tell their own stories using these taonga. Currently accessible through the online collection and the pop-up.
Canterbury Museum holds an internationally significant Antarctic collection — the largest outside Antarctica itself. Christchurch is the gateway city for NZ and US Antarctic operations. The collection connects directly to the LEARNZ Antarctica protocol and to the International Antarctic Centre protocol in this library.
The Christchurch Street — a recreation of a Victorian-era Christchurch streetscape — and Fred and Myrtle's Pāua Shell House are among the most distinctive social history exhibits in New Zealand. Both will return in the redeveloped museum. The online collection carries extensive social history material accessible now.
| Level | Years 0–6 | Years 7–10 | Years 11–13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I can describe one object from the Canterbury Museum online collection or pop-up that I found interesting and explain why it is kept in a museum. | I can describe what encountering the Canterbury Museum collection — online, in the pop-up, or at the redevelopment site — added to my understanding of Canterbury's history and culture that AI alone could not provide. | I can analyse the difference between encountering Canterbury Museum's collection digitally, in the pop-up, and at the physical site — and explain what each mode of access produces that the others cannot. |
| 2 | I can explain why Canterbury Museum is being redeveloped and name one thing the new museum will be able to do that the old one could not. | I can explain the key design decisions in the Canterbury Museum redevelopment — base isolation, Araiteuru, expanded Antarctic displays — and the specific problems each is designed to solve. | I can situate the Canterbury Museum redevelopment within the broader post-earthquake recovery of Christchurch and the wider international debate about museum decolonisation, heritage conservation, and digital access. |
| 3 | I can say one thing AI told me about Canterbury Museum or the earthquakes and whether it matched what I found in the online collection or pop-up. | I can identify where AI's account of Canterbury's history, the earthquakes, or the museum's collection matched what I encountered directly, and where the specific objects and the museum's own descriptions added something AI could not provide. | I can critically evaluate AI's account of post-earthquake recovery, museum decolonisation, or heritage engineering against the Canterbury Museum redevelopment's specific approach, identifying where the local evidence complicates or extends AI's general account. |
| 4 | I can say why looking at a real object in the pop-up or online gave me something different from reading about it in a book or asking AI. | I can explain what direct encounter with the online collection, the pop-up, or the redevelopment site adds to historical and cultural understanding that AI or secondary sources cannot replicate. | I can articulate the epistemological difference between knowing about Canterbury Museum's collection and redevelopment through AI and secondary sources, and encountering them directly — and explain what the 2029 physical reopening will make possible that no digital access can substitute for. |
| 5 | I can say one question the museum gave me that I still want answered — and whether I think the answer will be easier to find when the new museum opens in 2029. | I can identify a question about Canterbury's history, the redevelopment, or the collection that my encounter raised, and propose what source — including the 2029 museum — would best help me answer it. | I can propose a research question arising from my engagement with Canterbury Museum's collection and redevelopment, identify appropriate sources, and explain what the physical encounter with the reopened museum in 2029 would add to an AI-assisted inquiry that digital access cannot. |