Ask students to bring in rocks from wherever they find them — a garden, a beach, a riverbed, a road cutting, a driveway. Collect as many as possible.
Sort the collection into two groups: rounded rocks and angular rocks. No other criteria. Just that one question: rounded or angular?
Ask students: what do you think caused the difference? Where might each type have come from? Record their ideas before anything else happens.
Listen for the moment the geologist asks the same question students just tried to answer — and notice that he doesn't have a complete answer either.
| Level | Years 5–6 | Years 7–10 | Years 11–13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I can sort rocks into rounded and angular and say one difference I noticed. | I can describe the anomaly Chris identifies and say why it is unusual. | I can define the anomaly in sedimentological terms and identify what makes it significant. |
| 2 | I can say where I think my rounded rocks came from and why. | I can explain what normally causes rocks to become rounded and what that tells us about their history. | I can explain the depositional environment and why rounded clasts at this depth require explanation. |
| 3 | I can say one thing AI told me and whether it matched what I saw in my rocks. | I can say where AI's answer matched the video and where it fell short. | I can critically evaluate AI's response and identify where it generalises beyond the available evidence. |
| 4 | I can say why this is a puzzle — why the rocks seem to be in the wrong place. | I can explain why the location and age of these rocks together make the anomaly significant. | I can construct the anomaly as a formal scientific question and identify what evidence would be needed to answer it. |
| 5 | I can say what question I want answered in Part 2. | I can state a hypothesis that might explain the anomaly and say what evidence would support or refute it. | I can propose a testable hypothesis and identify the stratigraphic and sedimentological evidence that Part 2 should address. |