Download the Pukeahu self-guided resources from Te Akomanga before the visit. Assign students one memorial or feature to focus on and research in depth.
Students walk the park, photograph what they encounter, and record one question each memorial or feature gives them. The educator-historians' question applies to every site: whose voices, values, and experiences are missing here?
Back in the classroom, students bring their photographs and questions to AI using the prompts below. AI is the research partner — not the interpreter of meaning or the voice of the communities whose stories the park carries.
Students complete the Experience Trace Scale and develop a response to the citizenship question the programme asks: so what, and now what?
| Level | Years 5–6 | Years 7–10 | Years 11–13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I can describe one thing I saw at Pukeahu that I couldn't have understood without being there. | I can describe the multiple historical layers present at Pukeahu and explain what makes it more than a war memorial. | I can analyse Pukeahu as a contested historical landscape and identify the interpretive choices embedded in what is memorialised and what is marginal. |
| 2 | I can say whose story one memorial at Pukeahu tells and why that story matters. | I can explain the connection between at least two of Pukeahu's historical layers and identify how they relate to each other. | I can construct a historically informed argument about the relationship between war commemoration and colonial history at Pukeahu, drawing on evidence from the site. |
| 3 | I can say one thing AI told me about Pukeahu and whether it matched what I saw and felt at the park. | I can identify where AI's historical account matched what the site shows and where it omitted, simplified, or presented a single perspective. | I can critically evaluate AI's account of Pukeahu's histories against primary sources, the site's own memorials, and the perspectives of the communities whose stories are present there. |
| 4 | I can say why standing at Pukeahu gave me something I couldn't have got from reading about it. | I can explain what the physical experience of walking through Pukeahu adds to historical understanding that secondary sources and AI cannot provide. | I can articulate the distinction between knowing about a place of memory, reading accounts of it, and being physically present — and explain what each kind of encounter produces that the others cannot. |
| 5 | I can say one thing I want to do because of what I learned at Pukeahu. | I can identify a historical question or citizenship action raised by the visit and propose what I would do next — as a researcher or as a citizen. | I can develop a substantive response to the civic question Pukeahu raises — so what, and now what — drawing on historical evidence from the site and proposing a specific action or inquiry. |