Before the visit, ask students: what do you already know about Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and what do you want to understand better? A real question carried into the site gives AI something genuine to extend when students return.
At each site or museum, students note one thing that surprised them, one question the place opened that they didn't arrive with, and one thing they could not have understood without being there.
Students bring their notes, photographs, and questions to AI using the prompts below. AI extends the inquiry the visit started. It does not interpret what Te Tiriti means for the communities whose tūrangawaewae this is.
The Trace Scale records what the authentic experience produced that no digital resource could. This is the evidence of learning that travels with students beyond the visit.
| Level | Years 0–6 | Years 7–10 | Years 11–13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I can describe one thing I experienced at Waitangi that I couldn't have encountered on a screen. | I can describe what being at Waitangi — at the flagpole, in the museums, near the waka — added that reading about it could not. | I can analyse why physical encounter with the site of Te Tiriti's signing produces qualitatively different understanding from digital or AI-mediated access to its history. |
| 2 | I can say something I learned about Te Tiriti o Waitangi at Waitangi that genuinely surprised me. | I can explain the significance of at least two things I encountered at Waitangi — a site, a museum exhibit, or an artefact — and why each matters. | I can situate a specific aspect of the Waitangi visit — the two texts, He Whakaputanga, Te Rau Aroha — within the broader constitutional and historical debate about what Te Tiriti means and has meant. |
| 3 | I can say one thing AI told me about Waitangi and whether it matched what I learned at the Treaty Grounds. | I can identify where AI's account of Te Tiriti matched what I heard at Waitangi and where it simplified, omitted, or presented the debate as more settled than it is. | I can critically evaluate AI's account of Te Tiriti's history and constitutional status against the evidence and perspectives I encountered at Waitangi, identifying where AI's account is incomplete, contested, or misleading. |
| 4 | I can say why being at Waitangi gave me something I could not have got from a screen or from AI. | I can explain what standing at the flagpole grounds, walking through the museums, or seeing the waka in person adds to understanding that no digital resource provides. | I can articulate the difference between knowing about Te Tiriti, studying its texts, and being physically present at the place where it was signed — and explain what each encounter produces that the others cannot. |
| 5 | I can say one question my visit to Waitangi gave me that I still want answered. | I can identify a question raised by the visit and propose what source, experience, or person would help me answer it more fully. | I can develop a research question arising from the Waitangi visit, identify appropriate sources — including iwi voices, Waitangi Tribunal reports, and primary documents — and explain what additional knowledge would be needed for a well-founded response. |