← Credibility and Verification
Tomorrow Ready · Credibility and Verification
Subject adaptation · Years 9–10 · Science · Field-Based STEM · Tony Jones
When AI can supply background information instantly, the scientific thinking that should precede method selection disappears. Context Triage puts selection back in the student's hands before any method opens.
The teacher provides a short curated set of scientific information relevant to the investigation context. Before any method or investigation begins, students sort it and justify their sorting decisions.
The sort is the first visible evidence of disciplinary reasoning, produced before any tool shapes what the student thinks the investigation is about.
Year 9 — Ecology investigation
Students receive eight statements about a local ecosystem, including two that are tangentially relevant and one with a contested claim. The triage forces a decision about what the investigation is actually measuring, before a data collection method is named.
Year 10 — Chemistry or physics context
Students receive a set of claims about variables, including some that are true in general but not applicable to the specific experimental conditions. The sort reveals whether students understand scope and constraint, not just content.
Decision checkpoint
Design the information set deliberately: include one or two items that look relevant but are not, and one that requires checking. The productive disagreement among students about where items belong is the learning.
Teacher judgement note
Do not supply the correct sort. The teacher's role is to ask: "What would you need to know to move this from Question to Keep?" That question is the scientific thinking the strategy is designed to make visible.
Related frameworks
Context Triage: Keep, Cut, Question (core) · Verification Slip (Science Years 9–10) · Evaluation Gate