Tomorrow Ready · Evaluating AI Output
Subject adaptation · Years 1–4 · Health and Physical Education · Field-Based STEM · Tony Jones
Wellbeing knowledge that has not been personally arrived at is not wellbeing knowledge. In Health and PE at Years 1 to 4, Friction Framing grounds the inquiry in what the student genuinely knows from their own experience before any external source is consulted.
Before any health or PE investigation or discussion begins, students name what they already know from personal, physical, or lived experience, then identify the part they are least certain of.
Grounded in hauora: taha tinana (physical wellbeing) and taha hinengaro (mental and emotional wellbeing) are known from the inside, not only from information sources.
Years 1–2 — Movement and energy
Before any discussion about what makes the body feel energised, students draw one thing they notice in their own body when they are active. The uncertain part might be: "I think this happens but I'm not sure why." The commitment step names what they will pay attention to next.
Years 3–4 — Feelings and relationships
Before a class discussion about how we respond to strong emotions, students write one thing they already know from experience about what helps them feel calm. The friction step names one situation where that strategy does not work. The commitment states what they want to find out.
Decision checkpoint
At Years 1 to 2, drawing is a valid record of knowing. Accept sketches, diagrams, and annotated pictures as legitimate first-phase artefacts alongside written responses.
Teacher judgement note
Where a student's personal knowledge connects to home, whanau practice, or cultural experience, receive it as knowledge, not as an anecdote. The inquiry deepens from there; it does not correct from there.
Related frameworks
Position First Protocol · Boundary Card (Health and PE Years 1–4) · What AI Won't Tell You You're Wrong