Tomorrow Ready · Evaluating AI Output
Subject adaptation · Years 4–6 · Social Sciences · Field-Based STEM · Tony Jones
AI tools that feel collaborative will affirm the position a student already holds. Friction Framing surfaces the weakest assumption before any tool opens, so the challenge belongs to the task design rather than to the teacher.
Before any research or tool use begins, students write their current position, name the part they are least certain of, and commit in writing to either revise or hold firm with a specific reason.
The friction step creates a record of independent reasoning that exists before any tool is opened and cannot be reconstructed after the fact.
Years 4–5 — Local land use inquiry
Students write their initial prediction about why land in their area is used as it is. Most assume the land has always served its current purpose. The friction step asks why that might not be true. The commitment produces a specific revision or a stated reason to hold firm, before a single source is opened.
Year 6 — Community decision-making
Students name their initial position on whether a local issue was handled fairly. The friction step surfaces assumptions about who has authority to decide. The commitment creates a record of the student's reasoning before any research shapes it.
Decision checkpoint
The friction step is not a test. Frame it as: "What part of your idea are you least sure about?" Students who struggle to name a weakness often have the most to gain from the prompt.
Teacher judgement note
Where a student's position connects to whanau or community identity, receive the friction step as an invitation to strengthen reasoning, not as a challenge to personal knowledge.
Related frameworks
Position First Protocol · Context Triage (Social Sciences Years 1–3) · What AI Won't Tell You You're Wrong