← Evidence of Thinking
Tomorrow Ready · Evidence of Thinking

When AI Speaks, Students Position First

Teacher practice · Years 1–13 · Any subject · Field-Based STEM · Tony Jones

Voice AI now sounds fluent and considered even when the reasoning behind it is not. Without a prior record of student thinking, there is nothing to compare the final work against.
1Set the
Position
2Work with
Tools
3Compare at
Submission
4Assess the
Reasoning
The Strategy
  1. Before any research, AI use, or discussion, ask students to write their current position in two to four sentences: what do they think right now, and why?
  2. Students complete the task using tools permitted for this task, including AI where allowed.
  3. At submission, students complete a Position Comparison: what changed, what stayed the same, and what made the difference.
  4. Collect both documents alongside the finished work. Assess the Position Comparison for quality of reasoning.
Year-Band Practice

Years 1–3

Draw or dictate a starting idea before any shared discussion. At the end of the lesson, say one thing that changed.

Years 4–6

Write two sentences before researching. Compare to the conclusion using "I used to think / now I think." The comparison is the assessed piece.

Years 7–8

Write a full starting paragraph. The Position Comparison is a five-sentence piece graded for reasoning quality, not for whether the student changed their mind.

Years 9–10

Position and comparison are graded components, not optional reflections. Weight them toward the process mark alongside the finished work.

Years 11–13

The timestamped initial position serves as process evidence aligning with NZQA authenticity expectations for internally assessed work.

Implementation

Decision Checkpoint

Run this before any task involving drafting, research, or voice AI use. If students are using a voice interface or Claude in a document sidebar, the initial position must be recorded before any tool is opened.

Teacher Judgement Note

When the initial position and finished work show no tension and the comparison reads as post-hoc justification, treat this as a prompt for a brief conversation before any grade is applied.

Related Frameworks

Position First Protocol · Evidence Lock · Decision Vignette

Tony Jones · Founder, Field-Based STEM · Tomorrow Ready Resources · Free to use and share