Tomorrow Ready · Traceable Decisions
Subject adaptation · Years 9 to 10 · Health and Physical Education · Field-Based STEM · Tony Jones
A polished submission is evidence of production. What a student can reconstruct from memory, without access to their work, is evidence of understanding. The Reconstruction Check makes that distinction visible before the grade is assigned.
The Reconstruction Check separates fluent production from genuine understanding. After any drafting phase, students account for their key decisions from memory. What they can reconstruct belongs to them. The reconstruction is a diagnostic artefact, not a repeat of the task.
Three reconstruction prompts are provided on a printed slip. Students write two to three sentences per prompt. Teacher uses responses to identify which students need a brief follow-up conversation before marking begins.
Students write reconstruction responses without a prompt slip. The reconstruction is assessed as a graded component of the submission alongside the main piece of work, not as a pass or fail gate.
If a student's reconstruction does not match the content of their submitted work in a significant way, schedule a two-minute conversation before assigning a grade. The mismatch is diagnostic, not automatically a penalty.
Some students reconstruct less fluently than their written work suggests, not because they are dishonest but because working memory retrieval under time pressure is genuinely harder for some learners. Use a follow-up conversation before drawing conclusions about ownership.
Trace Map · Decision Vignette · Evidence Overlay