Core framework · Years 9–10 · Social Sciences · Field-Based STEM · Tony Jones
AI can produce a polished social inquiry. That is not the same as the student having done it. The Reconstruction Check reveals — in two minutes, without any tools — exactly what the student genuinely owns.
Students research and draft an explanatory paragraph on the causes of a significant historical event using any sources available. Tools close. Students write from memory: the cause they chose to prioritise, the evidence that led to that choice, and the thing they are least certain of. The account sits alongside the paragraph at submission.
Students draft a position on a current New Zealand social issue using class-approved sources and any tools they choose. Tools close. Students account in writing for why they took the position they did, what evidence shifted their thinking, and what a reasonable counter-argument would be. Where the account is thin, the teacher knows where to direct the next conversation.
The account needs three things: a named decision (not a summary of the draft), a specific piece of evidence (not a general reference), and a genuine uncertainty (not a boilerplate disclaimer). If all three are present, the account is complete.
Where a student's account is thin but their draft is strong, treat the gap as a teaching moment rather than an integrity finding. The Reconstruction Check surfaces what the student is ready to learn next. That is its primary value.
The Decision Trace Conference pairs naturally here for follow-up conversations. The Evidence Overlay extends the approach to multimodal tasks. Both are available in the Tomorrow Ready library.