← Credibility and Verification
Tomorrow Ready · Credibility and Verification
Subject adaptation · Years 11–13 · Mathematics and Statistics · Field-Based STEM · Tony Jones
AI tools produce statistical claims that sound authoritative and may be fabricated. The Verification Slip closes the gap between confident-sounding conclusions and verified ones, at the point of submission.
Students attach a short slip to any statistical investigation or extended response. The slip names one specific claim, checks it against a class-approved source, and states one genuine limit or uncertainty. The slip is assessed as a component of the submission.
NCEA-aligned: the limit or uncertainty statement directly addresses Merit and Excellence descriptors requiring consideration of the validity and reliability of statistical findings.
Year 11 — Statistical investigation
A student concludes that a trend in their data represents a general pattern. The Verification Slip requires them to name the specific claim, identify the data set that supports it, and state one condition under which the trend might not hold. The slip takes five minutes and produces a more honest conclusion.
Years 12–13 — Extended internal assessment
At senior levels, AI-generated context statements can include citations that look correct but do not exist. The Verification Slip requires students to confirm that the source they name is real and accessible, making fabricated references visible at submission.
Decision checkpoint
Establish the class-approved source list before the assessment begins, not after. Students should know which sources count as class-approved from the briefing stage.
Teacher judgement note
The limit or uncertainty statement is not a penalty on the student's work. Frame it as the evidence that a student understands the conditions of their own claim, which is the highest-order statistical thinking the task requires.
Related frameworks
Verification Slip (core) · Evidence Lock (Maths Years 11–13) · Evaluation Gate (Maths Years 11–13)