Find your nearest GeoTrips site at geotrips.org.nz. Read the site description yourself. Ask students one question before they go: what do you expect to find at a place like this?
Students observe, photograph, and handle rocks and fossils they find. Use the observation prompts in the next column. Students record what they see in their own words — notes, sketches, or voice recordings on a mobile phone.
Rocks, fossils, layers, textures, colours, scale. A lens cap, coin, or hand in the photograph gives scale. These images are the evidence students bring back to the classroom.
Students compare what they found with what they expected. They bring their photographs and observations to AI and test general geological knowledge against what they actually saw.
What does this rock or fossil tell us about the environment that existed here, long before this place looked anything like it does today?
| Level | Years 5–6 | Years 7–10 | Years 11–13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I can describe one thing I saw at the site that I couldn't have seen in a classroom. | I can describe the key geological features of the site and explain what makes them significant. | I can characterise the site's geology in terms of rock type, structure, and depositional environment. |
| 2 | I can say what I think the environment looked like a long time ago based on what I found. | I can reconstruct the environmental history of the site from the evidence I observed and explain my reasoning. | I can construct a stratigraphic narrative from my observations and identify the evidence that supports each interpretive step. |
| 3 | I can say one thing AI told me and whether it matched what I saw at the site. | I can identify where AI's response matched the site evidence and where it generalised beyond what the site specifically shows. | I can critically evaluate AI's geological interpretation against my own observations and the site documentation, identifying points of agreement, generalisation, and uncertainty. |
| 4 | I can explain why being at the site gave me something I couldn't have got from a screen. | I can explain what direct observation adds to geological interpretation that secondary sources cannot provide. | I can articulate the distinction between field observation, secondary documentation, and AI-generated synthesis, and explain the evidential weight of each. |
| 5 | I can say one question I have now that I didn't have before I visited the site. | I can identify what remains uncertain or unexplained about the site and propose what investigation would resolve it. | I can propose a research question arising from my observations, identify appropriate investigative methods, and explain what a definitive answer would contribute to understanding the site's geological history. |