Years 9–10Health and Physical EducationBoundary Card

When students hold two things at once

Working with genuine ambivalence about AI in Health and PE

The condition

Research on AI users consistently finds that hope and concern about the same technology tend to live inside the same person at the same time. Those who benefit most from AI in a given area are also the most likely to worry about it. Students in your classroom are probably doing exactly this — and it deserves a better response than "pro" or "against." The Boundary Card gives that ambivalence a constructive home.

The move — Boundary Card

Before any task involving personal decision-making, wellbeing, or values, students complete a Boundary Card that describes their own position — not a rule set for them.

  1. Before any task involving personal decision-making, wellbeing, or values, place a Boundary Card on each desk with three boxes: AI can help with... / AI cannot do... / I must show...
  2. Students complete the card individually in silence. They are not describing a rule you have set. They are describing their own position on this task, for this purpose.
  3. In pairs, students share one entry from any box. The discussion prompt is: "Did you put different things in the boxes than your partner?" Do not push for consensus — difference is the point.
  4. Collect the cards. Use them as the first piece of evidence in the task, not as a compliance check. Return them with assessed work at the end.
  5. At the end of the unit, ask students to complete a second Boundary Card for the same task type. Ask them to compare the two: what shifted, and why?
What the student produces
A completed Boundary Card naming a considered personal position on AI use in this specific context, written in their own words before the task begins. The comparison card at the end of the unit produces a short written or spoken reflection on how their thinking changed. Together, these form a visible record of the student's developing relationship with a tool they are already using.
Why it holds up

The Boundary Card produces evidence of the student's own reasoning about a genuine complexity — which is exactly what Health and PE requires. Whether or not AI was used in the task itself, the thinking visible in the card and the reflection is the student's. No tool can complete a Boundary Card on someone's behalf without the student's active thinking, because the card asks for a personal position, not a generic answer.

Teacher judgement note

Where students express strong anxiety about AI, or strong dependence on it, the Boundary Card reflection may surface real pastoral concerns. Treat it as a learning conversation, not a compliance document. Agree with your team how card reflections are stored and referenced across the unit.

Governance reminder

The Boundary Card in Health and PE contexts may open conversations that cross into wellbeing territory. Brief your team on a consistent approach: if a student's card reflection signals significant anxiety or dependence, the follow-up is pastoral, not performative. The card is a learning tool. Treat what it reveals accordingly.

NZ Curriculum connection: Health and Physical Education — Personal health and physical development; Personal identity; Key competency: thinking

Print or save this resource as a PDF using your browser.

← Back to Designing for Integrity