A boundary is not a ban. It is a condition that protects the learning goal. These resources give you task structures that build integrity into the design rather than policing it after the fact.
When integrity is designed in from the start, teachers stop asking whether students used AI and start asking whether they can show their thinking.
"Options are allowed. Decisions must be shown." That one norm, consistently applied, flips the focus from product to process and makes integrity observable without playing detective.
The Boundary Card gives students three boxes to fill before they begin: AI can help with, AI cannot do, and I must show. The power is not the form. It is the boundary language that makes thinking visible.
If AI can draft instantly, the safeguard is sequence. Lock evidence first, then draft. Students select approved evidence anchors, explain why each matters, and commit to using them as the spine before any drafting begins.
One claim, one check against class-approved sources, one limit or uncertainty. A routine, not a unit. The Verification Slip forces a pause: what am I asserting, how do I know, and what could make this unreliable?
A low-stakes, high-signal in-class re-performance. One decision made, one piece of evidence used, one uncertainty. Creates a secure evidence point without turning the classroom into a surveillance zone.
Standardise thinking evidence, not the tool. Stable process artefacts that travel across platforms: Boundary Card, Evidence Lock list, Verification Slip, and the 90-second decision vignette.
Evidence Lock before drafting, Decision Vignette during. Students lock their source selections with one-sentence justifications, then respond to one teacher question about a writing decision. Together they make the process behind the product observable.
Students select evidence anchors and justify each before drafting begins. At submission, they note what they used, what they rejected, and what changed. The Evidence Lock list is assessed alongside the essay, not instead of it.
Three anchors locked before analysis begins, plus a 90-second Decision Vignette during the task. Together they create a layered authenticity record for statistical investigations at NCEA level.
Students select from a class-approved evidence set and justify each piece before drafting. A 90-second vignette during the task confirms they can speak to their decisions. Three components, two independent evidence points.
A three-box card naming what tools may do, what they may not do, and what the student must show — submitted at the start of the project, not the end. Keeps creative decision-making with the student throughout.
A Boundary Card completed at the briefing stage names what tools may assist with, what must remain the student's own decision, and what evidence of their thinking will be shown. Travels with the design portfolio to submission.
Three boxes before any working begins. The third box — "I must show..." — is where the mathematics learning lives. Students name what they will demonstrate before the tool is opened.
Students complete a Boundary Card that names their own position on AI use in this specific context — not a rule set for them. A comparison card at the end of the unit records how their thinking changed. The only HPE-specific resource in the library.
New Designing for Integrity resources are added regularly. Subscribe to aiEDnz below to receive them as they are released.
Get new resources every week.
The aiEDnz newsletter publishes practical AI integrity resources for NZ teachers every week. Subscribe free and receive new resources as they are released.
Subscribe to aiEDnz →