Years 7–8EnglishEvidence Lock + Decision Vignette

Making the draft visible before the paragraph is finished

Locking the evidence before drafting begins in Years 7–8 English

The condition

In English classrooms, student writing can arrive at submission looking complete: well-structured, fluent, appropriately paragraphed. But when teachers ask students to explain a phrasing choice, identify what they rejected, or say what the next paragraph would argue, the answers are thin. The product has arrived without the process. For English teachers, this matters because the NZC intention for English is that students develop as writers — which requires decision-making to be visible.

The move — Evidence Lock + Decision Vignette

Two moves used together: Evidence Lock before drafting, Decision Vignette during. Both are brief. Together they make the writing process traceable.

  1. Before drafting begins, give students a curated set of three to five short texts, quotes, or examples relevant to the writing task. Tell them these are their only approved sources for this draft.
  2. Students select two or three pieces they will use and complete an Evidence Lock card: for each piece, one sentence explaining why they chose it for this specific task.
  3. Students draft. The Evidence Lock card sits beside them and must be referenced in the draft — each selected piece must appear.
  4. While drafts are underway, move quickly through the class and ask each student one consistent question: "What did you almost use that you left out, and why?" or "Where did the draft change from what you planned?"
  5. Collect the Evidence Lock card with the draft. The card is the assessed process artefact.
What the student produces
An Evidence Lock card showing which sources were selected and why, plus a draft that references those sources. The student also responds briefly and orally to one teacher question about a decision made during writing. The combination shows selection, rationale, and awareness of the writing process — independent of how polished the final product reads.
Why it holds up

Choosing evidence and explaining why it fits this task — not just any task — requires genuine engagement with the writing purpose. The oral vignette adds a secure in-class evidence point that does not depend on the written product alone. Together they make the thinking behind the draft observable and assessable.

Teacher judgement note

When designing the Evidence Lock source set, check that texts represent diverse voices and do not inadvertently position one cultural perspective as the authoritative default.

Governance reminder

Brief your English team on consistent Evidence Lock expectations. When students know they will always need to justify their source selections before drafting begins, they engage with evidence packs more carefully. Agree across the team: the Evidence Lock card is assessed alongside the draft, not treated as scaffolding to be discarded.

NZ Curriculum connection: English — Writing; Reading; Text analysis; Key competency: using language, symbols, and texts

Print or save this resource as a PDF using your browser.

← Back to Designing for Integrity